When it is needed
- it is unclear who performed which examinations
- the joint conclusion does not follow from the individual results
- the experts exceeded their competence
- significant materials or alternative causes were not examined
What is examined
- the order appointing the examination
- the panel's competence and composition
- examination sections and methods used
- the connection between intermediate and joint conclusions
Result
A written review listing the deficiencies identified and explaining their significance.
Limitation
The expert team, methods and feasibility of reaching a conclusion are determined after reviewing the materials. A court-appointed examination is conducted within the scope of the relevant order or ruling.